The American Trial Lawyers Association Badge
American Association for Justice Badge
Florida Justice Association Badge
AV Preeminent Badge
Million Dollar Advocates Forum Badge

Stryker to Pay $1.4 Billion Settlement

 Stryker to Pay $1.4 Billion

As you may recall, Stryker Corporation had several serious issues with some of their products that were sold to many doctors, hospitals, and other medical providers all across the country. The Michigan-based company sells implants that are used for hip replacement surgery. These products have left many patients in serious pain or dealing with other complications such as swelling and debilitating injuries directly related to product use.

Recently, a settlement was announced between Stryker Corp. and thousands of patients who received the Rejuvenate or ABG II hip replacement systems. Due to the Stryker products’ defects, these patients had to undergo revision surgery to remove or replace the problematic devices. Many patients and healthcare workers claimed that Stryker was neglectful in the design of the devices, as well as negligent in properly testing the safety of the devices before distributing them for use. The company was also accused of hiding pertinent information about the risks of serious injury and death, as well as failing to warn patients and healthcare professionals of the devices’ dangers. Stryker recalled both of its hip systems in July 2012, admitting during the recall that the neck components often rub against each other as the patient walks, and that this rubbing causes metallic debris. The debris can travel through a patient's bloodstream or tissue and cause serious problems, making revision surgery a necessity.

According to the settlement, Stryker will provide an approximate payment of $300,000 to each plaintiff in 39 states. Thousands of cases from all over the country were filed in the U.S. federal court and consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL), a common grouping of several lawsuits against a single entity. New Jersey State Superior Court Judge Brian Martinotti oversaw the Stryker hip replacement settlement, which is not for a fixed sum--meaning Stryker’s liability will not be capped. Many experts anticipate the total amount of payments under the settlement will exceed the current $1.4 billion.

The Stryker hip replacement settlement includes all plaintiffs who underwent revision surgery before November 3, 2014. It’s important to note that additional terms of the payment may be negotiated for further claims after this date. The settlement allows patients who have been injured due to Stryker’s negligent actions to recover a wide range of damages. Plaintiffs can seek moneys for lost wages, pain and suffering, medical expenses (including future medical expenses), and other financial losses. In some cases, plaintiffs may also seek punitive damages for Stryker’s conduct. Throughout the coming months, claims from each affected patient will be examined on a case-by-case basis.

In order to be included in the Stryker hip replacement settlement, patients must submit their claims by March 2, 2015. Payments are scheduled to be distributed in the summer of 2015, with the remainder of payments expected to be received by the end of 2015. If you or a loved one has been affected by faulty or defective Stryker hip replacement products and would like your case to be considered as part of the settlement, contact a lawyer to help you navigate the legal process. The attorneys at Friedman, Rodman & Frank are ready to assist in this lawsuit. We’ve helped families file claims against those responsible for victim’s injuries and we can help you, too. Remember, there is a fast-approaching deadline to file your claim, so act quickly!

We strongly believe in fair and just compensation for everyone who has been the victim of someone else’s negligence. Please contact us online so we can help you and your family receive the justice you deserve. You can also call us day or night and speak with a live attorney at 305-448-8585 or toll-free at 877-448-8585.

Client Reviews
Carolyn Frank and her firm represented me on a workers compensation injury case, under the defense base act. She did a excellent job from the moment I contacted her until 3 years later the case was settled. Every benefit I was entitled too, Carolyn fought hard to secure. E-mails and phone calls were always returned promptly. Definitely 5 star rating. Daniel
Highly recommending Carolyn Frank would be an understatement. Being careful as to whom I would give my case to as I had dedicated most of my adult life to one company. I needed someone who would work for me, value my case and my needs. Carolyn Frank and her valued staff met all of the above. From the first meeting I knew I was in the right office. Her knowledge, professionalism and what I would soon find to be outstanding dedication to my case from her and her staff were second to none. Marcos G.
Mr. Friedman was my choice after a dog bite attack. Him and his firm took on my case in a very professional matter without lacking empathy. I felt like he and his team personally cared for me and they kept me up to date on every step of the process. The outcome was great and I am very happy that I have chosen them. I already have recommended them to my friends and family and if you are looking for legal support I highly recommend a meeting with the firm. Any first time consultation is free, ( to my knowledge). So what do you have to lose. Give them a call! You'll be in great hands. Nora N.
Caroyln's expertise and compassion got me through a very trying period of my life. She is an excellent lawyer and human being. 5 Star all the way! Lois H.
I met Carolyn Frank about three years ago. Once I met her I knew she was the attorney I needed to handle my case.When we met with her the first time we were there for at least two hours. When I left her office I knew she was the right person to handle my case.At that time my case was 22 years old and I needed someone who knew what they were doing. This was a complex case and it fell under the Long shore Act..There are not many attorneys that handle this type of case in Florida. Mike P.