ATTORNEY REACHES CONFIDENTIAL MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE SETTLEMENT FOR COMATOSE CLIENT

Case: Scott McGrath vs. Kendall Regional Medical Center

Case No.: 10-48628-CA-01

Description: Medical negligence.

Filing dates: September 7, 2010

Settlement date: February 15, 2012

Settlement amount: Confidential

Judge: Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Victoria Platzer

Plaintiff attorney: Ronald Rodman and Estefania Baird, Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A., Miami, Florida ; Pamela Beckham and Robert Beckham, Beckham & Beckham, P.A., North Miami Beach, Florida

Defense attorney: Scott Solomon and Glenn Falk, Falk, Waas, Hernandez, Coral Gabes, Florida

Details: Scott McGrath, a twenty-six (26) year old non-verbal autistic was brought to Kendall Regional Medical Center on July 8, 2008 having suffered a severe aspiration pneumonia which resulted in a respiratory arrest. Upon arrival at Kendall Regional Medical Center Mr. McGrath was intubated and admitted to the ICU where he remained intubated until the afternoon of July 13, 2008. Following five (5) days of improvement the decision was made to extubate Mr. McGrath by his treating pulmonologist. Despite fluctuating vital signs over a period of approximately thirteen (13) hours post extubation, the intensive care unit nursing staff failed to contact the on duty intensivist, attending physician, or pulmonologist regarding these changes in condition. At approximately 4:00 a.m. on July 14, 2008 Scott McGrath coded sustaining a respiratory/cardiac arrest. Mr. McGrath remains in a vegetative state to date as a result of the hypoxic event.

Plaintiff case: A lawsuit was brought on behalf of Scott McGrath by his mother as guardian based on negligent nursing care and treatment received in the ICU. Plaintiff’s attorneys argued that Mr. McGrath’s condition post extubation required notification and intervention by a physician. Plaintiff’s discovery revealed that the hospital maintains an intensivist twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days per week, located approximately thirty (30) feet from Plaintiff, McGrath’s room. It was further Plaintiff’s contention that a re-intubation was necessary and there was no reason why Plaintiff would not have been able to return to his pre-morbid state had he received timely medical treatment and care.

Defense case: Defense argued that appropriate nursing intervention occurred during the thirteen (13) hour period post extubation and that the Plaintiff’s hypoxia was the result of his aspiration pneumonia at home and the failure to obtain timely medical care. The Defendants further claimed that despite the order for extubation in all likelihood Mr. McGrath would never have completed a successful extubation after being admitted into ICU.

Comments: “Our hope is that this unfortunate incident creates a higher awareness amongst hospital staff of the importance of ICU patient care, and helps to protect those who need it the most.”

Client Reviews
Carolyn Frank and her firm represented me on a workers compensation injury case, under the defense base act. She did a excellent job from the moment I contacted her until 3 years later the case was settled. Every benefit I was entitled too, Carolyn fought hard to secure. E-mails and phone calls were always returned promptly. Definitely 5 star rating.
★★★★★
Highly recommending Carolyn Frank would be an understatement. Being careful as to whom I would give my case to as I had dedicated most of my adult life to one company. I needed someone who would work for me, value my case and my needs. Carolyn Frank and her valued staff met all of the above. From the first meeting I knew I was in the right office. Her knowledge, professionalism and what I would soon find to be outstanding dedication to my case from her and her staff were second to none. Marcos G.
★★★★★
Mr. Friedman was my choice after a dog bite attack. Him and his firm took on my case in a very professional matter without lacking empathy. I felt like he and his team personally cared for me and they kept me up to date on every step of the process. The outcome was great and I am very happy that I have chosen them. I already have recommended them to my friends and family and if you are looking for legal support I highly recommend a meeting with the firm. Any first time consultation is free, ( to my knowledge). So what do you have to lose. Give them a call! You'll be in great hands. Nora N.
★★★★★
Caroyln's expertise and compassion got me through a very trying period of my life. She is an excellent lawyer and human being. 5 Star all the way! Lois H.
★★★★★
I met Carolyn Frank about three years ago. Once I met her I knew she was the attorney I needed to handle my case.When we met with her the first time we were there for at least two hours. When I left her office I knew she was the right person to handle my case.At that time my case was 22 years old and I needed someone who knew what they were doing. This was a complex case and it fell under the Long shore Act..There are not many attorneys that handle this type of case in Florida. Mike P.
★★★★★